From the LJ World, Boyda says she'll fund war no matter what.
Is anyone else dizzy from keeping track of Boyda's positions on the war?
She was against it. Then she was for supporting our troops. Then she was for winning the war. Then she was for a timetable to withdraw the troops. Then she was for the Baker Commission. Then she said she would do whatever the Commander-in-Chief wanted. Then she voted for a timetable. Now she says she'll vote to fund the war, period.
Last year Democrats were energized against the war and a lot of independents and moderate Republicans went for Boyda because there were ready to wind down the war. My gut tells me a lot of the independents and Republicans who voted for her are now feeling buyer's remorse. At least Jim Ryun had a consistent position.
Dedicated to the proposition that Nancy Boyda is a one termer.