Boyda? or Pelosi? or both? is spurring quite a bit of discussion, on this blog and others.
I've made quite clear my opinions on why the two Nancys are tied at the hip.
But to answer the Bloc on immigration, Nancy Boyda may NOW have a different public stand on immigration, but she campaigned just like Nancy Pelosi.
In 2006, Nancy Boyda said two very important and well-documented things about immigration. First, she said that immigration reform needed to have a "clear path to citizenship." That is a code phrase for amnesty. Second, she said that we should not build a border fence.
This is where her heart lies on immigration, regardless of what she says now. It is likely where she will return if given enough time in office!
Moreover, it proves that Nancy Boyda is not a person of principle. If she truly believed in what she campaigned on, why abandon it? If she never truly believed that in the first place, then what other bill of goods was she selling the voters in a say anything mode to get elected?
Had enough of Nancy Boyda?
16 comments:
i love how you talk about "code words" and conspiracies and the like.
my guess is how she votes is how she feels, and you can sit and spin with your code words.
Not code words, not conspiracies. Boyda is a liar and a hypocrite. Spin that.
I eat lunch nearly every week with a person that works for Boyda at the Gem Building. This person is really frustrated with Nancy's constantly changing positions and the interference that Steve runs in the whole operation. Every decision has to be vetted through Steve and its impact on contributors.
fine...she's not a liar or a hypocrite.
No, she's BOTH!
Signed,
A former Boyda staffer
I was formerly involved in the 2006 Boyda campaign and must admit I am deeply disappointed in the performance of Nancy Boyda as a U.S. Representative. I had high hopes for her. I actually thought Jim Ryun had done a worthy job as our Representative but mistakenly bought into the notion that Boyda could do even better. Boy was I ever wrong. Folks, I have learned that "the grass isn't always greener on the other side".
i hate people who lie on blogs.
this former boyda staffer is very happy with her, and would NEVER allow the district to have ryun again.
she's not a liar (you'll never find anything she's ever lied in any of her statements- ever) and she's not a hypocrite.
you've all lost your minds if you think steve and nancy even still talk to each other.
i'll believe you're all 'insiders' who 'eat lunch with the staff' when you start talking about the REAL relationship those two have...or if you ever, once, don't just repeat what other witless wonders have said.
I posted earlier that I have lunch with a current Topeka staffer of Boyda's. Yes, you know that I do. I notice you're not denying that Nancy is hated by her staff and that they hate Steve even more.
My advice to any doubters: ask Jason or Chad...
nancy isn't hated by her staff and they don't hate steve..there...denied.
To the last poster...good attempt at spinning the dislike of the staff toward Nancy and Steve...they are definitely disliked by former AND current staff. Like most people, they need a job and won't publicly rock the boat.
Signed,
A former Boyda staffer
I can tell you this, those of us in the Governor's office despise both Nancy and Steve. They are overbearing, obnoxious and mean-spirited.
Jim Ryun Robs banks in his spare time. He told me so himself.
Signed,
A former Ryun staffer.
I stand by my source(s). Shanan and Nancy and Steve know this information is true.
god bless blogs...allowing random people to slander without ever having to face anyone.
this kansas democrat loves nancy, steve, shanan, chad, jason, and anyone else i've ever come in contact with in any of nancy's offices or campaigns.
none of her staff would EVER say anything like the things you are saying, and i think rational people understand you're just trying to cause problems by being junior high boys.
Post a Comment